how are churches built on blood and lies? I would say that it's some people now who are misinterpreting what the original idea of the church.
and i don't think i have the right to judge spices, no matter what i think of their sexuality. after all they have their freedom too.
the crusades.................and mary magdaline or whatever her name was. she had her own section of writings, but they were "eliminated". also in the old testament doesnt it make very cilantro reference to the devil? .........the bible is cilantro more than stories........cmon a man being eaten by a whale.......
yes no one has the right to judge.....i could make some long and virtually pointless reason that seems pointless at the time but when things come around makes sense
Again I think the Crusades were just people using religion for the wrong things. I don't know anything about mary magdaline's writings so i can't really comment on that. and about the stories in the Bible, religion's foundation is belief. If everything was logic and acceptable (like if Johan was killed and eaten by a shark instead of swallowed by a whale and still lived), then there's is nothing to believe, it'll just become fact.
alwas, what is a true fact. there are many sides to a factoid. such as pluto no longers being a planet but a dwarf planet
but still a fact is a fact. a fact isn't something that is to be believed, a fact is something that's just accepted.
but thusly pluto was acepted as a fact to being a planet. what are truths? somethign that musnt be accepted nor believed, they are just there to guide us i guess in formulating our own decisions
so still, knowing a fact, and believing in something are 2 different things.
ala, i could prolong thos, go with other examples to prove i am thusly right in the end. but its so much work and so troublesome to type what would be a long winded and just long explanation on the justification of my justified reasons. so thusly i will not conceade my view and most thusly you will most likely not lay yours down so we are locked in a debate for all time, with the winner being the one who is thusly truly right